At my day job, we are in the early stages of a massive redesign and reorganization of the primary website at Roosevelt University. With nearly 100 content editors spread across two campuses, you can imagine that the amount of content on our site is pretty intimidating. If a website is a garden, ours has, in parts, gone back to prairie. A key component to taming this beast is going to have to be the institution of more clear and concrete content governance rules. One of the tools I’ve been toying around with for this purpose is a set of questions to ask stakeholders every time a new piece of content is requested, and whenever an old piece of content is reviewed. The questions are heavily influenced by Eileen Webb’s A List Apart article, “Evaluating Ideas,” which is a very quick, very worthwhile read.
Here is the set of questions so far:
- Who is the primary audience for this content?
- What task does this content help that audience complete?
- What business objectives of the University does this content fulfill, and how?
- How will audiences find or be driven to this content?
- Are there other/better channels through which this content can be communicated to the audience rather than through a webpage?
- Who owns this content?
- Who will maintain this content?
- How often and when will it be reviewed for accuracy, etc.?
- What would constitute “success” for this content, and can we measure it?
- Under what circumstances would this content no longer be required and need to be removed from the website?
If you use a similar set of questions for ensuring your organization’s web content retains a high level of quality, I’d love to hear how you use them, and how they might differ from the ones listed above.